STREITEN GEGEN DIE ZEIT
by Stella AC susanne fasbender
In this multi-part film, I aim to express a universal understanding that goes beyond differences and controversies through the montage of international struggles against enclosures, evictions and exploitation, against war and repression – all of which I encounter in Germany – while also undertaking an attempt at epistemic violence against the hegemonic sovereignty of knowledge and interpretation.
In 2018, I began doing interviews because I wanted to listen and connect. I work slowly and daily, embedded in my life, just as a painter sits at her pictures. Sometimes with, but almost always without public funding and in constant confrontation with the developments of the time. It takes a long time, I work on my films for several years and in the meantime I publish some of the interviews in full length, as well as clips and videos that I put online, but the actual film is something else again.
The new and institutionalized German accusation of Antisemitism, now also articulated with a view to postcolonialism, placed a stone in my path, for which I am very grateful today: I had to ask new questions to find out how I could respond to the moral imperative of a German campaign of accusations in a way that would make this dispute fruitful for the anti-colonial, feminist and anti-capitalist narratives of my film.
It is precisely the analysis of the fight against anti-Semitism led by the German government in agreement with the right-wing Alternative for Germany party that reveals and unfolds for me a liberated understanding of what anti-Semitism actually is and how the Holocaust can be understood in relation to other genocidal mass crimes of the 20th century, as well as in relation to the transatlantic slave trade.
With the help of the many texts by historians, philosophers and genocide researchers who have devoted themselves to this discourse for years and decades, also with reference to the singularity thesis of the Holocaust, a morally instrumentalized dictate can be broken in favor of an emancipatory move with the questions that have been discussed, from denial to comparison versus equating to public remembrance.
I learned to understand history in a more complex way, going beyond basic antagonism, learning to bear controversy and to understand in a new way anti-Semitism, the various forms of racism, from anti-black racism to anti-Palestinian racism, and thus to decipher the tools of capital even better in their details and differences. So I will now weave the specifically German way of dealing with the reason of state as a central theme into the variety of struggles, which may turn out to be fruitful.
In their book “Safety through Solidarity - A Radical Guide to Fighting Antisemitism” (Melville House Publishing 2024), Shane Burley and Ben Lorber describe an analysis of antisemitism from a traditionally left-wing Jewish perspective. Although the following quote refers to the US-American situation, which is different from the German one, for example, in terms of white, Christian nationalism, it is at the same time a universal statement about a progressive fight against antisemitism:
Antisemitism has not „reappeared“, because in truth, it never left us - the „crisis“ is simply more visible in political life as exclusionary movements create a new populist narrative that provides alienated people someone to blame. Progressive movements have stood up against other forms of oppression, tracing the historic roots, and contemporary fruits, of white supremacy, colonialism, patriarchy, queerphobia, and many other llls plaguing our world. But we lack a similar framework for understanding what antisemitism is, and how to fight it.
This book is an attempt to put the fight against antisemitism back on the progressive agenda, where it belongs.
In the United States, and around the world, progressive Jews and our allies are building safety through solidarity: committing to fight antisemitism alongside all other forms of oppression, as we strengthen each other against the rising tide of white Christian nationalism, which threatens us all. We offer a justice-driven analysis of antisemitism, and a window into the social movements committed to taking it on and building a better world.
The film thus continues to negate the hegemony of the answers that permeate the history of capitalism, including war, genocide and the destruction of nature, and questions the anchoring of the racialization of peoples within human society that has been developed over centuries, so that I can leave the text of the film's previous concept as it is:
How could the powerful distinctions: civilized / primitive, developed / underdeveloped, rational / irrational, livable / killable become politically effective and, at the same time, make the violent processes that led to their creation invisible? What do Eurocentric hegemonies of knowledge mean? Have they perhaps inscribed themselves into “Western” social consciousness in a way that could ultimately be seen as an impoverishment of thought? How can we break open the militarization, demarcation, walls, wars and destruction of nature that are postulated as a factual constraint, in order to sow a new seed in this rupture.
And yet, the end of violence is also present in us – in the midst of barbarism, genocide, the destruction of nature and the apocalypse. It is, to quote Karl Marx, “the dream” that already contains the reality, for which we lack consciousness – or the physical power to act – to bring this reality into the world in order to renew it. In this context, the often lamented dispute about how we should fight, think and orient ourselves is also understood as a productive driving force, as a constant of constantly new beginnings in a permanent, unfinished confrontation with the contradictions of the world. We meet in recognition of all our differences, but with the common goal of renewing the world from below.
My lecture "BRANDSPUREN – Epilog zur Unterscheidung – Von der eurozentrischen Aneignungslogik zur Entuferung des Weltenbrandes" was created as part of my basic research
A visit to documenta 15 would also become a site of contention around questions of the relationship between anti-Semitism and anti-colonialism. This includes questioning the prevailing “prohibition” on addressing the history of the expulsion of Palestinians since the beginning of Zionism or viewing and discussing their art at documenta 15.